Generally, there are two main types of installation with different branches.
Perfect installation means that shading on the module surface during a day and the strongest sunlight on a day perpendicular to the module surface are avoided. Therefore, perfect installation is possible if the modules rotate according to the sun's path, which is not possible with a fixed mounting system. However, the best fixed installation is the position where on average the most energy is obtained during the year or the maximum (KWh/KW.year).
Another factor is of course sufficient space for cleaning the modules, maintenance and installation. In other words, the arrangement of the array is also important.
Using London as an example, Figure 4 shows that PV has the highest altitude and then the highest irradiation in different months around noon towards the south. On the other hand, the lack of elevation and then also the irradiance is shown if it deviates from 0 azimuth.
On the other hand, the tilt of the PV array should be close to the average elevation to find the highest possible energy during a year. As an example: If the tilt is set to 50 degrees, the PV array will be perpendicular to the sun's rays in summer but not in the other months, and if the tilt is set to 20 degrees, the PV array will be perpendicular to the sun's rays in winter but not in the other months. Fortunately, there are several apps and websites that calculate or offer you the best tilt for fixed mounting systems.
Depending on the shape and limited area of the roof, the modules should be arranged according to certain criteria. Pitched roofs have a simple scenario: in most cases, the modules should lie on the surface; in other words, the tilt of the modules will be like the roof tilt, but avoiding shadows is a general rule that should be taken into account.
However, the concept of installation on a pitched roof is the same for all types, but if you refer to the roof material, the mounting method is different. It can be divided into two main types: Segments (Figure 4) and Rack (Figure 5). In the segment method, there are matrix arrangements in stands, but they are not connected to each other and modules are installed on them. In the rack method, there is a network of aluminum rails on which the modules are installed.
A two-directional installation or an east-west installation could be a good choice if the roof shape is aligned in an east-west direction. In this case, energy could be achieved over a longer period of time during the day compared to a one-way installation facing south.
In principle, the arrangement of the modules should refer to the shape of the roof (Figure 7), but sometimes it can be different. Then the designer should decide which of two aspects is more important as a reference: azimuth or roof shape. In either case, an ideal roof is the roof oriented in geographical directions and then towards the northern hemisphere, a south-oriented array in one direction, or a two-directional array with two sides facing east and west. In summary, more geographical deviation results in less energy output.
There are two other important issues: loads and weights. The mounting on the roof must be very resistant to wind. On pitched roofs, the connections must be able to withstand the wind load, but on flat roofs they could be weighted down if drilling and bolting to the roof is not possible (Figure 9). Of course, the weighting must be done under observation of the inherent ceiling load. In other words, the maximum permissible load must be considered. However, the wind load can be calculated by graphics (Figure 10).
Basically, the concept of the Open Space mounting system is the same as that of the Rooftop. However, there may be more flexibility in the arrangement.
There are two different types: Fixed (Figure 11) and Tracking (Figure 12). There are two different types of tracking, 1D and 2D. A 1D tracking system only rotates around one axis and can then change the area on two sides, such as east-west; 2D tracking, on the other hand, rotates around two axes. The rotation around two axes allows an exact alignment to the sun and therefore a better efficiency of the mounting system, but the initial investment and periodic costs are high. The most important factor is the feasibility, which represents the energy production price compared to the costs.